little bullshit comparison , me i love both of them don't choose one have both its easier !!
Year 2003-04 (similar years)
Engine Liquid cooled, single cylinder, two stroke electric powervalve (same)
Capacity 125 (win cagiva 0 points)
Bore x Stroke 54 x 54.5mm (win cagiva points)
Dell'Orto PHBH 28 BD / reeds (same)
Ignition / Starting Electronic with fixed spark advance CDI (win cagiva 0 points)
Max Power 34 hp- 24.8 kW @ 11250 rpm ( to similar to call )
Max Torque 20 Nm @ 10000 rpm ( to similar to call )
Transmission / Drive 6 Speed / chain (same)
Front Suspension Inverted 40mm forks in high tensile steel. 120 mm wheel travel ( to similar to call )
Rear Suspension Swinging fork with two asymmetric arms in Aluminium fusion with thin-walled monocoque. Single hydraulic shock absorber. 120mm wheel travel ( to similar to call )
Front Brakes Single 320mm disc 4 piston caliper
Rear Brakes Single 220mm disc 1 piston caliper ( to similar to call )
Rear Tyre 150/60-17 ( to similar to call )
Fuel Capacity 14. Litres ( 1 point aprilia)
Consumption average 21.2 km/lit (1 point aprilia)
Standing ¼ Mile 19.0 sec (big lose 0 points)
Top Speed 93mph
fun 10/10 ( to similar to call )
Cagiva Mito 125
Year 2002-03 (similar years)
Engine Liquid cooled, , two stoke single cylinder, electric power valve (same)
Capacity 125.6 (1 point to cagiva)
Bore x Stroke 56 x 50.6 mm (win 1 point)
Compression Ratio 6.3:1
Induction Dell'Orto carb Ignition / Starting CDI / electric / adjustable timing (win cagiva 1 point)
Max Power 34 hp 24.8 kW @ 12000 rpm ( to similar to call)
Max Torque 23 Nm @ 11000 rpm ( to similar to call )
Transmission / Drive 6 Speed / chain (same)
Front Suspension 40mm Marzocchi telescopic forks, 120mm wheel travel.( to similar to call )
Rear Suspension Monoshock, 133mm wheel travel. ( to similar to call )
Front Brakes Single 320mm disc 4 piston caliper
Rear Brakes Single 230mm disc 2 piston caliper ( to similar to call )Rear Tyre 150/60 ZR17 ( to similar to call )
Fuel Capacity 12.5 Litres ( lose 0 points)
Consumption average 20.1 km/lit (lose 0points)
Standing ¼ Mile 14.2 ses
Top Speed ( 101 win cagiva 1 point)
fun 10/10 ( to similar to call )
so it seem cagiva mito wins hands down although rs125 in more economical (who cares) , i prefer the mito for looks myself as well , but thats just personal opinion ive got both and love both , rs125 rotax engines are a lot easier to rebuild though but cagiva uses its own engine .
both are great fun and quick.
to be honest both are great i cant tell any real world differences ..
No comments:
Post a Comment